964 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christopher Haster
0bbb8bc88b Reorganized external project links a bit
These were grouped up a bit better at one point, but that sort of
drifted as new project were added:

1. Official repos (mainly littlefs-fuse)
2. Non-C reimplementations/wrappers
3. Utilities
4. Non-littlefs related projects

Eventually, maybe when these move out of the README.md, these categories
should probably be actually codified as headers or something.
2024-04-17 13:46:33 -05:00
Christopher Haster
78082336e7 Added a link to mklittlefs
Implemented by earlephilhower, mklittlefs is a command line interface
that seems to be used by the ESP8266 and RP2040 ecosystems. It deserves
a mention.

Also tweaked mklfs's description a bit.
2024-04-17 13:39:11 -05:00
Christopher Haster
8336ecd203 Added a link to pico-littlefs-usb (FAT12 emulation)
Implemented by oyama, pico-littlefs-usb provides an easy interface to
littlefs by emulating a FAT12 filesystem over USB.

There are some tradeoffs to this, but being able to mount a littlefs
device without installing additional drivers is very nice. Maybe in the
future devices could provide both a FAT and raw endpoint for
easy/advanced filesystem access.
2024-04-17 13:09:04 -05:00
Christopher Haster
68d28b5114
Merge pull request #966 from BrianPugh/fix-divide-by-zero-full-filesystem
Fix DivideByZero exception when filesystem is completely full.
v2.9.2
2024-04-17 12:38:22 -05:00
Christopher Haster
1bc14933b7 Tweaked on-disk config comments for consistency
- Prefer "defaults to blablabla when zero" to hint that this is the
  default state when both explicitly set to zero and implicitly set to
  zero thanks to C's initializers.

- Prefer "disk" when referencing something stored "on disk". Other terms
  can quickly get ambiguous. Except maybe "block device"...
2024-04-17 00:16:20 -05:00
Christopher Haster
01b6a47ea8 Extended test_alloc to test inferred block_count
The block allocator is an area where inferred block counts (when
cfg.block_count=0) are more likely to cause problems.

As is shown by the recent divide-by-zero-exhaustion issue.
2024-04-17 00:04:56 -05:00
Brian Pugh
749a45650f Fix DivideByZero exception when filesystem is completely full. 2024-04-16 20:32:12 -07:00
Christopher Haster
11b036cc6c Prevented unnecessary superblock rewrites if old version in superblock chain
Because multiple, out-of-date superblocks can exist in our superblock
chain, we need to be careful to make sure newer superblock entries
override older superblock entries.

If we see an older on-disk minor version in the superblock chain, we
were correctly overriding the on-disk minor version, but we were also
leaving the "needs superblock" bit set in our consistency state.

This isn't a hard-error, but would lead to a superblock rewrite every
mount. The rewrite would make no progress, as the out-of-date version is
effectively immutable at this point, and just waste prog cycles.

This should fix that by clearing the "needs superblock" bit if we see a
newer on-disk minor version.
2024-03-19 00:49:28 -05:00
Christopher Haster
25ee90fdf1 Clarified what is accessible at specific superblock offsets in SPEC.md
It used to be the case that the entire superblock entry could be found
at specific offsets, but this was only possible while the superblock
entry was immutable. Now that the superblock entry is very mutable
(block-count changes, lfs2.0 -> lfs2.1 version bumps, etc), the correct
superblock entry may end up later in the metadata log.

At the very least, the "littlefs" magic string is still immutable and at
the specific offset offset=8. This is arguably the most useful
fixed-offset item.
2024-03-19 00:49:28 -05:00
Christopher Haster
a60a986c9c Duplicate the superblock entry during superblock expansion
The documentation does not match the implementation here. The intended
behavior of superblock expansion was to duplicate the current superblock
entry into the new superblock:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||bs=4096 | ||bs=4096 |
  ||bc=256  | ||bc=256  |
  ||crc32   | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

The main benefit is that we can rely on the magic string "littlefs"
always residing in blocks 0x{0,1}, even if the superblock chain has
multiple superblocks.

The downside is that earlier superblocks in the superblock chain may
contain out-of-date configuration. This is a bit annoying, and risks
hard-to-reach bugs, but in theory shouldn't break anything as long as
the filesystem is aware of this.

Unfortunately this was lost at some point during refactoring in the
early v2-alpha work. A lot of code was moving around in this stage, so
it's a bit hard to track down the change and if it was intentional. The
result is superblock expansion creates a valid linked-list of
superblocks, but only the last superblock contains a valid superblock
entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|crc32   |->|littlefs|
  ||        | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

What's interesting is this isn't invalid as far as lfs_mount is
concerned. lfs_mount is happy as long as a superblock entry exists
anywhere in the superblock chain. This is good for compat flexibility,
but is the main reason this has gone unnoticed for so long.

---

With the benefit of more time to think about the problem, it may have
been more preferable to copy only the "littlefs" magic string and NOT
the superblock entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||crc32c  | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

This would allow for simple "littlefs" magic string checks without the
risks associated with out-of-date superblock entries.

Unfortunately the current implementation errors if it finds a "littlefs"
magic string without an associated superblock entry, so such a change
would not be compatible with old drivers.

---

This commit tweaks superblock expansion to duplicate the superblock
entry instead of simply moving it to the new superblock. And adds tests
over the magic string "littlefs" both before and after superblock
expansion.

Found by rojer and Nikola Kosturski
2024-03-19 00:48:56 -05:00
Christopher Haster
4dd30c1b8f
Merge pull request #948 from littlefs-project/fix-sync-ordering
Fix sync issue where data writes could appear before metadata writes
v2.9.1
2024-03-08 16:49:59 -06:00
Christopher Haster
5c0d332ecd
Merge pull request #939 from Graveflo/master
Add nim-littlefs to readme
2024-03-08 16:49:11 -06:00
Christopher Haster
cf68333a55
Merge pull request #937 from littlefs-project/fix-pending-rm-get-underflow
Fix synthetic move underflows in lfs_dir_get
2024-03-08 16:48:50 -06:00
Christopher Haster
7873d811a0 Fixed memory leak in emubd's out-of-order write emulation
We need to decrement the saved block state on sync, when we reset
out-of-order emulation. Otherwise we leak blocks out the wazoo.
2024-02-27 21:39:34 -06:00
Christopher Haster
fc2aa3350c Fixed issue with exhaustive + out-of-order powerloss testing
Unlike the heuristic based testing, exhaustive powerloss testing
effectively forks the current test and runs both the interrupted and
uninterrupted test states to completion. But emubd wasn't expecting
bd->cfg->powerloss_cb to return.

The fix here is to keep track to both the old+new out-of-order block
states and unrevert them if bd->cfg->powerloss_cb returns.

This may leak the temporary copy, but powerloss testing is already
inherently leaky.
2024-02-27 21:14:59 -06:00
Christopher Haster
6352185949 Fixed sync issue where data writes could appear before metadata writes
Long story short we aren't calling sync correctly in littlefs. This
fixes that.

Some forms of storage, mainly anything with an FTL, eMMC, SD, etc, do
not guarantee a strict write order for writes to different blocks. In
theory this is what bd sync is for, to tell the bd when it is important
for the writes to be ordered.

Currently, littlefs calls bd sync after committing metadata. This is
useful as it ensures that user code can rely on lfs_file_sync for
ordering external side-effects.

But this is insufficient for handling storage with out-of-order writes.

Consider the simple case of a file with one data block:

1. lfs_file_write(blablabla) => writes data into a new data block

2. lfs_file_sync() => commits metadata to point to the new data block

But with out-of-order writes, the bd is free to reorder things such that
the metadata is updated _before_ the data is written. If we lose power,
that would be bad.

The solution to this is to call bd sync twice: Once before we commit
the metadata to tell the bd that these writes must be ordered, and once
after we commit the metadata to allow ordering with user code.

As a small optimization, we only call bd sync if the current file is not
inlined and has actually been modified (LFS_F_DIRTY). It's possible for
inlined files to be interleaved with writes to other files.

Found by MFaehling and alex31
2024-02-27 14:00:10 -06:00
Christopher Haster
f2a6f45eef Added out-of-order write testing to emubd
Some forms of storage, mainly anything with an FTL, eMMC, SD, etc, do
not guarantee a strict write order for writes to different blocks. It
would be good to test that this doesn't break littlefs.

This adds LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO to lfs_emubd, which tells lfs_emubd to
try to break any order-dependent code on powerloss.

The behavior right now is a bit simple, but does result in test
breakage:

1. Save the state of the block on first write (erase really) after
   sync/init.

2. On powerloss, revert the first write to its original state.

This might be a bit confusing when debugging, since the block will
appear to time-travel, but doing anything fancier would make emubd quite
a bit more complicated.

You could also get a bit fancier with which/how many blocks to revert,
but this should at least be sufficient to make sure bd sync calls are in
the right place.
2024-02-27 13:59:37 -06:00
Ryan McConnell
2752d8c486
add nim-littlefs to readme 2024-02-07 02:53:16 -05:00
Christopher Haster
ddbfcaa722 Fixed synthetic move underflows in lfs_dir_get
By "luck" the previous code somehow managed to not be broken, though it
was possible to traverse the same file twice in lfs_fs_traverse/size
(which is not an error).

The problem was an underlying assumption in lfs_dir_get that it would
never be called when the requested id is pending removal because of a
powerloss. The assumption was either:

1. lfs_dir_find would need to be called first to find the id, and it
   would correctly toss out pending-rms with LFS_ERR_NOENT.

2. lfs_fs_mkconsistent would be implicitly called before any filesystem
   traversals, cleaning up any pending-rms. This is at least true for
   allocator scans.

But, as noted by andriyndev, both lfs_fs_traverse and lfs_fs_size can
call lfs_fs_get with a pending-rm id if called in a readonly context.

---

By "luck" this somehow manages to not break anything:

1. If the pending-rm id is >0, the id is decremented by 1 in lfs_fs_get,
   returning the previous file entry during traversal. Worst case, this
   reports any blocks owned by the previous file entry twice.

   Note this is not an error, lfs_fs_traverse/size may return the same
   block multiple times due to underlying copy-on-write structures.

2. More concerning, if the pending-rm id is 0, the id is decremented by
   1 in lfs_fs_get and underflows. This underflow propagates into the
   type field of the tag we are searching for, decrementing it from
   0x200 (LFS_TYPE_STRUCT) to 0x1ff (LFS_TYPE_INTERNAL(UNUSED)).

   Fortunately, since this happens to underflow to the INTERNAL tag
   type, the type intended to never exist on disk, we should never find
   a matching tag during our lfs_fs_get search. The result? lfs_dir_get
   returns LFS_ERR_NOENT, which is actually what we want.

Also note that LFS_ERR_NOENT does not terminate the mdir traversal
early. If it did we would have missed files instead of duplicating
files, which is a slightly worse situation.

---

The fix is to add an explicit check for pending-rms in lfs_dir_get, just
like in lfs_dir_find. This avoids relying on unintended underflow
propagation, and should make the internal API behavior more consistent.

This is especially important for potential future gc extensions.

Found by andriyndev
2024-02-04 15:12:31 -06:00
Christopher Haster
f53a0cc961
Merge pull request #929 from littlefs-project/devel
Minor release: v2.9
v2.9.0
2024-01-23 12:33:13 -06:00
Christopher Haster
42910bc8e5 Bumped minor version to v2.9 2024-01-19 14:37:37 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a3e1d12ce1
Merge pull request #915 from littlefs-project/well-done
Rename internal functions _raw* -> _*_
2024-01-19 13:58:29 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a70870c628 Renamed internal functions _raw* -> _*_
So instead of lfs_file_rawopencfg, it's now lfs_file_opencfg_.

The "raw" prefix is annoying, doesn't really add meaning ("internal"
would have been better), and gets in the way of finding the relevant
function implementations.

I have been using _s as suffixes for unimportant name collisions in
other codebases, and it seems to work well at reducing wasted brain
cycles naming things. Adopting it here avoids the need for "raw"
prefixes.

It's quite a bit like the use of prime symbols to resolve name
collisions in math, e.g. x' = x + 1. Which is even supported in Haskell
and is quite nice there.

And the main benefit: Now if you search for the public API name, you get
the internal function first, which is probably what you care about.

Here is the exact script:

  sed -i 's/_raw\([a-z0-9_]*\)\>/_\1_/g' $(git ls-tree -r HEAD --name-only | grep '.*\.c')
2024-01-19 13:20:56 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ceb17a0f4a
Merge pull request #917 from tomscii/fix_return_value_of_lfs_rename
Fix return value of lfs_rename()
2024-01-19 13:19:21 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a8a0905777
Merge pull request #916 from littlefs-project/ci-ubuntu-latest
Change CI to just run on ubuntu-latest
2024-01-19 13:19:07 -06:00
Christopher Haster
13d78616fe
Merge pull request #914 from littlefs-project/inline-max
Add inline_max, to optionally limit the size of inlined files
2024-01-19 13:18:54 -06:00
Christopher Haster
8b8fd14187 Added inline_max, to optionally limit the size of inlined files
Inlined files live in metadata and decrease storage requirements, but
may be limited to improve metadata-related performance. This is
especially important given the current plague of metadata performance.

Though decreasing inline_max may make metadata more dense and increase
block usage, so it's important to benchmark if optimizing for speed.

The underlying limits of inlined files haven't changed:
1. Inlined files need to fit in RAM, so <= cache_size
2. Inlined files need to fit in a single attr, so <= attr_max
3. Inlined files need to fit in 1/8 of a block to avoid metadata
   overflow issues, this is after limiting by metadata_max,
   so <= min(metadata_max, block_size)/8

By default, the largest possible inline_max is used. This preserves
backwards compatibility and is probably a good default for most use
cases.

This does have the awkward effect of requiring inline_max=-1 to
indicate disabled inlined files, but I don't think there's a good
way around this.
2024-01-19 13:00:27 -06:00
Christopher Haster
09972a1710
Merge pull request #913 from littlefs-project/gc-compactions
Extend lfs_fs_gc to compact metadata, compact_thresh
2024-01-19 12:51:11 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ed7bd05435
Merge pull request #912 from littlefs-project/relaxed-lookahead
Relaxed lookahead alignment, other internal block alloc readability improvements
2024-01-19 12:27:14 -06:00
Christopher Haster
b5cd957f42 Extended lfs_fs_gc to compact metadata, compact_thresh
This extends lfs_fs_gc to now handle three things:

1. Calls mkconsistent if not already consistent
2. Compacts metadata > compact_thresh
3. Populates the block allocator

Which should be all of the janitorial work that can be done without
additional on-disk data structures.

Normally, metadata compaction occurs when an mdir is full, and results in
mdirs that are at most block_size/2.

Now, if you call lfs_fs_gc, littlefs will eagerly compact any mdirs that
exceed the compact_thresh configuration option. Because the resulting
mdirs are at most block_size/2, it only makes sense for compact_thresh to
be >= block_size/2 and <= block_size.

Additionally, there are some special values:

- compact_thresh=0  => defaults to ~88% block_size, may change
- compact_thresh=-1 => disables metadata compaction during lfs_fs_gc

Note that compact_thresh only affects lfs_fs_gc. Normal compactions
still only occur when full.
2024-01-19 12:25:45 -06:00
Christopher Haster
1195d606ae
Merge pull request #909 from littlefs-project/easy-util-defines
Add some easier util overrides: LFS_MALLOC/FREE/CRC
2024-01-19 12:24:16 -06:00
Christopher Haster
1711bdef76
Merge pull request #886 from BrianPugh/macro-sanity-check
Add value-range checks for user-definable macros at compile-time
2024-01-19 12:23:36 -06:00
Christopher Haster
f522ed907a Added tests over rename type errors 2024-01-17 00:10:30 -06:00
Tom Szilagyi
4f32738cd6 Fix return value of lfs_rename()
When lfs_rename() is called trying to rename (move) a file to an
existing directory, LFS_ERR_ISDIR is (correctly) returned. However, in
the opposite case, if one tries to rename (move) a directory to a path
currently occupied by a regular file, LFS_ERR_NOTDIR should be
returned (since the error is that the destination is NOT a directory),
but in reality, LFS_ERR_ISDIR is returned in this case as well.

This commit fixes the code so that in the latter case, LFS_ERR_NOTDIR
is returned.
2024-01-17 00:06:52 -06:00
Christopher Haster
6691718b18 Restricted LFS_FILE_MAX to signed 32-bits, <2^31, <=2147483647
I think realistically no one is using this. It's already only partially
supported and untested.

Worst case, if someone does depend on this we can always revert.
2024-01-16 23:40:30 -06:00
Christopher Haster
1fefcbbcba Rearranged compile-time constant checks to live near lfs_init
lfs_init handles the checks/asserts of most configuration, moving these
checks near lfs_init attempts to keep all of these checks nearby each
other.

Also updated the comments to avoid somtimes-ambiguous range notation.

And removed negative bounds checks. Negative bounds should be obviously
incorrect, and 0 is _technically_ not illegal for any define (though
admittedly unlikely to be correct).
2024-01-16 23:39:51 -06:00
Christopher Haster
60567677b9 Relaxed alignment requirements for lfs_malloc
The only reason we needed this alignment was for the lookahead buffer.

Now that the lookahead buffer is relaxed to operate on bytes, we can
relax our malloc alignment requirement all the way down to the byte
level, since we mainly use lfs_malloc to allocate byte-level buffers.

This does introduce a risk that we might need word-level mallocs in the
future. If that happens we will need to decide if changing the malloc
alignment is a breaking change, or gate alignment requirements behind
user provided defines.

Found by HiFiPhile.
2024-01-16 00:27:07 -06:00
Christopher Haster
897b571318 Changed CI to just run on ubuntu-latest
If we already have to bump this version as GitHub phases out older
Ubuntu runners (which is reasonable), I don't really see the value of
pinning a specific version. We might as well just respond to any
broken dependencies caused by GitHub's implicit updates as they
happen...

It's not like CI is truly continuous.
2023-12-21 00:33:44 -06:00
Christopher Haster
3513ff1afc
Merge pull request #911 from littlefs-project/fix-release-structs
Fix struct sizes missing from generated release notes
v2.8.2
2023-12-21 00:08:16 -06:00
Christopher Haster
8a22bd6e67
Merge pull request #910 from littlefs-project/fix-superblock-expansion-thresh
Increase threshold for superblock expansion from ~50% -> ~88% full
2023-12-21 00:07:55 -06:00
Christopher Haster
9b82db72d8
Merge pull request #898 from zchen24/patch-1
Update DESIGN.md minor typo
2023-12-21 00:06:29 -06:00
Zihan Chen
99b84ee3db Update DESIGN.md, fix minor typo 2023-12-20 23:42:26 -06:00
Christopher Haster
b1b10c0e75 Relaxed lookahead buffer alignment
This drops the lookahead buffer from operating on 32-bit words to
operating on 8-bit bytes, and removes any alignment requirement. This
may have some minor performance impact, but it is unlikely to be
significant when you consider IO overhead.

The original motivation for 32-bit alignment was an attempt at
future-proofing in case we wanted some more complex on-disk data
structure. This never happened, and even if it did, it could have been
added via additional config options.

This has been a significant pain point for users, since providing
word-aligned byte-sized buffers in C can be a bit annoying.
2023-12-20 00:39:11 -06:00
Christopher Haster
1f9c3c04b1 Reworked the block allocator so the logic is hopefully simpler
Some of this is just better documentation, some of this is reworking the
logic to be more intention driven... if that makes sense...
2023-12-20 00:24:56 -06:00
Christopher Haster
7b68441888 Renamed a number of internal block-allocator fields
- Renamed lfs.free      -> lfs.lookahead
- Renamed lfs.free.off  -> lfs.lookahead.start
- Renamed lfs.free.i    -> lfs.lookahead.next
- Renamed lfs.free.ack  -> lfs.lookahead.ckpoint
- Renamed lfs_alloc_ack -> lfs_alloc_ckpoint

These have been named a bit confusingly, and I think the new names make
their relevant purposes a bit clearer.

At the very it's clear lfs.lookahead is related to the lookahead buffer.
(and doesn't imply a closed free-bitmap).
2023-12-20 00:17:08 -06:00
Christopher Haster
e91a29d2b5 Fixed struct sizes missing from generated release notes
This script was missed during a struct -> structs naming change
2023-12-19 22:00:18 -06:00
Christopher Haster
b9b95ab4bc Increase threshold for superblock expansion from ~50% -> ~88% full
Superblock expansion is an irreversible operation. In an effort to
prevent superblock expansion from claiming valuable scratch space
(important for small, <~8 block filesystems), littlefs prevents
superblock expansion when the disk is "mostly full".

In true computer-scientist fashion, this "mostly full" threshold was
set to ~50%.

As pointed out by gbolgradov and rojer, >~50% utilization is not
uncommon, and it can lead to a situation where superblock expansion does
not occur in a relatively healthy filesystem, causing focused wear at
the root.

To remedy this, the threshold is now increased to ~88% (7/8) full.

This may change in the future and should probably be eventually user
configurable.

Found by gbolgradov and rojer
2023-12-19 16:51:17 -06:00
Christopher Haster
9a620c730c Added LFS_CRC, easier override for lfs_crc
Now you can override littlefs's CRC implementation with some simple
defines:

  -DLFS_CRC=lfs_crc

The motivation for this is the same for LFS_MALLOC/LFS_FREE. I think
these are the main "system-level" utils that users want to override.

Don't override with this something that's not CRC32! Your filesystem
will no longer be compatible with other tools! This is only intended for
provided hardware acceleration!
2023-12-19 14:12:10 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a0c6c54345 Added LFS_MALLOC/FREE, easier overrides for lfs_malloc/free
Now you can override littlefs's malloc with some simple defines:

  -DLFS_MALLOC=my_malloc
  -DLFS_FREE=my_free

This is probably what most users expected when wanting to override
malloc/free in littlefs, but it hasn't been available, since instead
littlefs provides a file-level override of builtin utils.

The thinking was that there's just too many builtins that could be
overriden, lfs_max/min/alignup/npw2/etc/etc/etc, so allowing users to
just override the util file provides the best flexibility without a ton
of ifdefs.

But it's become clear this is awkward for users that just want to
replace malloc.

Maybe the original goal was too optimistic, maybe there's a better way
to structure this file, or maybe the best API is just a bunch of ifdefs,
I have no idea! This will hopefully continue to evolve.
2023-12-19 13:57:17 -06:00
Zihan Chen
10bcff1af8
Update DESIGN.md minor typo 2023-11-26 11:10:24 -08:00