The seqlock write unlock function was incorrectly calling
seqlock_write_begin() instead of seqlock_write_end(), and was releasing
the lock before incrementing the sequence. This could lead to a race
condition and a corrupted sequence number becoming odd even though the
lock is not held.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200129144948.2161551-1-luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Fixes: 988fcafc73 ("seqlock: add QemuLockable support", 2018-08-23)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Tracked down with an ugly, brittle and probably buggy Perl script.
Also move includes converted to <...> up so they get included before
ours where that's obviously okay.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Seqlock implementation for QEMU. Usage idiom
reader:
do {
start = seqlock_read_begin(&sl);
...
} while (seqlock_read_retry(&sl, start));
writer:
seqlock_write_lock(&sl);
...
seqlock_write_unlock(&sl);
initialization:
seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl, QemuMutex *mutex)
mutex could be NULL if the caller will provide its own protection
for concurrent write sides (typically using the BQL).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
