'ssstrict' is a RVA23 profile-defined extension defined as follows:
"No non-conforming extensions are present. Attempts to execute
unimplemented opcodes or access unimplemented CSRs in the standard or
reserved encoding spaces raises an illegal instruction exception that
results in a contained trap to the supervisor-mode trap handler."
In short, we need to throw an exception when accessing unimplemented
CSRs or opcodes. We do that, so let's advertise it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20250529202315.1684198-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20250604174329.1147549-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We have support for sdtrig for awhile but we are not advertising it. It
is enabled by default via the 'debug' flag. Use the same flag to also
advertise sdtrig.
Add an exception in disable_priv_spec_isa_exts() to avoid spamming
warnings for 'sdtrig' for vendor CPUs like sifive_u.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250604174329.1147549-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
From the time we added RVA22U64 until now the spec didn't declare 'RVB'
as a dependency, using zba/zbb/zbs instead. Since then the RVA22 spec
[1] added the following in the 'RVA22U64 Mandatory Extensions' section:
"B Bit-manipulation instructions
Note: The B extension comprises the Zba, Zbb, and Zbs extensions. At the
time of RVA22U64's ratification, the B extension had not yet been
defined, and so RVA22U64 explicitly mandated Zba, Zbb, and Zbs instead.
Mandating B is equivalent."
It is also equivalent to QEMU (see riscv_cpu_validate_b() in
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c).
Finally, RVA23U64 [2] directly mentions RVB as a mandatory extension,
not citing zba/zbb/zbs.
To make it clear that RVA23U64 will extend RVA22U64 (i.e. RVA22 is a
parent of RVA23), use RVB in RVA22U64 as well.
(bios-tables-test change: RVB added to riscv,isa)
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/profiles.adoc#61-rva22u64-profile
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/rva23-profile.adoc#rva23u64-profile
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250115184316.2344583-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shgatpa is defined in RVA22 as:
"For each supported virtual memory scheme SvNN supported in satp, the
corresponding hgatp SvNNx4 mode must be supported. The hgatp mode Bare
must also be supported."
Claim support for shgatpa since this is always true for TCG.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shvstvecd is defined in RVA22 as:
"vstvec.MODE must be capable of holding the value 0 (Direct).
When vstvec.MODE=Direct, vstvec.BASE must be capable of holding any
valid four-byte-aligned address."
This is always true for TCG so let's claim support for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shvstvala is defined in RVA22 as:
"vstval must be written in all cases described above for stval."
By "cases describe above" the doc refer to the description of sstvala:
"stval must be written with the faulting virtual address for load,
store, and instruction page-fault, access-fault, and misaligned
exceptions, and for breakpoint exceptions other than those caused by
execution of the EBREAK or C.EBREAK instructions. For
virtual-instruction and illegal-instruction exceptions, stval must be
written with the faulting instruction."
We already have sstvala, and our vstval follows the same rules as stval,
so we can claim to support shvstvala too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
As per the step 5 in the process documented in bios-tables-test.c,
generate the expected ACPI AML data files for RISC-V using the
rebuild-expected-aml.sh script and update the
bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
These are all new files being added for the first time. Hence, iASL diff
output is not added.
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240716144306.2432257-10-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
